Wednesday, June 13, 2012
Saturday, May 26, 2012
Thursday, May 3, 2012
A bug.
We're in the season when kazillions of miller moths migrating from the Great Plains to the Rockies fly over our house, with a great number of them mistaking our house for a Motel Moth 6. A couple of days ago we spotted the creature below on our front deck. I don't know what it is. Maybe the Queen of Miller Moths?
Monday, April 23, 2012
Wednesday, April 4, 2012
Monday, April 2, 2012
Saturday, March 31, 2012
Lotto lunacy.
Spending a dollar on a lottery ticket doesn't have to be a waste of money. If you get a little bit of excitement from it, maybe it was the best use for that dollar. But why do people get more excited when the prize gets bigger? In what way would winning $640M be better than winning, say, $10M, or even $1M?
The odds of winning the Mega Millions lottery are 1 in 176 million, so I suppose someone might say that it makes sense to play anytime the pot exceeds $176M. That's an interesting thought. If you had the money and bought 176 million tickets you'd have a pretty good chance to win, but that would be far from certain. And if you had bought those tickets, you might have been one of the 3 winners in this lottery and won $213M and change, but since you were already a multi-millionaire you probably wouldn't be really excited about it.
My thinking is that the difference between winning $640M and $1 is that the big prize would be at least 640 times more likely to ruin your life. I'd much rather have 640 chances to win $1M than 1 chance to win $640M, but I wouldn't pay for them.
Lottery officials know that people jump up with their wallets open when the prizes get big, which is why the odds are so steep. But if they changed the game so the odds were about 1 in 1 million to win $1M, I think they'd make more money. Maybe not right away, but before long you'd hear about people in your city who won, or maybe even someone you know. Then even I might head down to the liquor store to buy a weekly ticket. Even though I'm not likely to win anything with a million to one odds, it would be more exciting than having a ridiculous chance to win a ridiculous amount.
Monday, March 26, 2012
Erotica.
My brain has been running in sand lately, which is bad for blogging. As consolation, here is the most erotic video I have ever seen:
Monday, March 19, 2012
Wednesday, March 14, 2012
Amazon bombs.
No posts here in a while - Tax Season for Twila and Apathy Season for me. I have been planning a series of posts, but something popped up that interrupted my train of thought.
Everyone loves Amazon.com, including me. They're so convenient, especially with the free delivery thing. I don't even go to the store for rubber bands anymore, just order them on Amazon and two days later they appear, as if by magic. But Amazon has eroded my confidence in them. I learned that they sell products with warranties that will not be honored by the manufacturers and they do not inform customers of that.
I ordered on Amazon a vaporizer manufactured by a company called Vapir. It has a one year warranty. About 32 days after I bought the vaporizer something went wrong in the electronics. Naturally, that was two days past Amazon's return period, so I contacted Vapir to have the product repaired under the warranty. They told me that they do not honor warranties of any of their products sold on Amazon.
That relates to Amazon's merchants program, where other companies can sell through Amazon. Vapir told me that they cannot ascertain who is really selling the vaporizers and even if they might be used. Amazon has an "A to z Guarantee Protection" policy regarding their merchants program, which sounds inclusive. However, their only guarantee is that a product will arrive at your door intact. They specifically state that all warranty claims after 30 days must be submitted to the manufacturer.
Naturally I was somewhat annoyed that I had a defective $150 vaporizer with an invalid warranty. I appealed to Amazon and they relented with a "one-time only exception" of their return policy. Nevertheless, I told them in several emails that I was unhappy with their policy of not stating that a warranty might be void. They pretended to be concerned. I returned the vaporizer, but I didn't have the original packaging. As a result, Amazon deducted $25.60 from the refund amount.
That was enough for me. I wrote to Amazon and told them that their failure to alert customers about the warranties is unethical if not illegal, and that I intended to pursue the matter. Their response was only to say that they would refund the $25.60. Too little, too late.
Today I filed a complaint with the FTC. I also contacted the Washington Post (a favorite newspaper) to ask if they have an investigative reporter who might be interested in pursuing this. I haven't heard back from either entity, but that will happen. In the meantime, be careful what you buy from Amazon. They told me that the only way to learn if a warranty will be valid is to contact the manufacturer directly. How helpful is that?
Everyone loves Amazon.com, including me. They're so convenient, especially with the free delivery thing. I don't even go to the store for rubber bands anymore, just order them on Amazon and two days later they appear, as if by magic. But Amazon has eroded my confidence in them. I learned that they sell products with warranties that will not be honored by the manufacturers and they do not inform customers of that.
I ordered on Amazon a vaporizer manufactured by a company called Vapir. It has a one year warranty. About 32 days after I bought the vaporizer something went wrong in the electronics. Naturally, that was two days past Amazon's return period, so I contacted Vapir to have the product repaired under the warranty. They told me that they do not honor warranties of any of their products sold on Amazon.
That relates to Amazon's merchants program, where other companies can sell through Amazon. Vapir told me that they cannot ascertain who is really selling the vaporizers and even if they might be used. Amazon has an "A to z Guarantee Protection" policy regarding their merchants program, which sounds inclusive. However, their only guarantee is that a product will arrive at your door intact. They specifically state that all warranty claims after 30 days must be submitted to the manufacturer.
Naturally I was somewhat annoyed that I had a defective $150 vaporizer with an invalid warranty. I appealed to Amazon and they relented with a "one-time only exception" of their return policy. Nevertheless, I told them in several emails that I was unhappy with their policy of not stating that a warranty might be void. They pretended to be concerned. I returned the vaporizer, but I didn't have the original packaging. As a result, Amazon deducted $25.60 from the refund amount.
That was enough for me. I wrote to Amazon and told them that their failure to alert customers about the warranties is unethical if not illegal, and that I intended to pursue the matter. Their response was only to say that they would refund the $25.60. Too little, too late.
Today I filed a complaint with the FTC. I also contacted the Washington Post (a favorite newspaper) to ask if they have an investigative reporter who might be interested in pursuing this. I haven't heard back from either entity, but that will happen. In the meantime, be careful what you buy from Amazon. They told me that the only way to learn if a warranty will be valid is to contact the manufacturer directly. How helpful is that?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)